Sonny's Forum Replies

OK, so I didn't realise that there was a free option on Spotify!

Now I do, so I'm good to go...

I don't have a Spotify subscription, but I will try to replicate the playlist using the means at my disposal. For what it's worth here's a few suggestions:

Esoteric - Descent from A Pyrrhic Existence (2019)

Colosseum - Towards the Infinite from Chapter 2: Numquam (2009)

Electric Wizard - Supercoven from the Supercoven EP (1998)

Cathedral - Schizoid Puppeteer from the Serpent's Gold compilation album (2010)

MSW - Humanity from Obliviosus (2020)

Solstice - Cromlech from New Dark Age (1998)

Winter - Servants of the Warsmen from Into Darkness (1990)

Sleep - Dragonaut from Holy Mountain (1992)

Pallbearer - Foreigner from Sorrow and Extinction (2012)

Hi Ben, could you please add your compatriot, Egyptian Book of the Dead-obsessed The Horn. Also German Atmo-Black / Death Metal crew Cinereous Rain. Thanks a lot.

I have listened to quite a bit of DSBM and I hear absolutely no reason to include it in The Fallen, despite the definition of it on RYM mentioning doom metal, in reality very little, if any, doom is present in the vast majority of releases.

How about the Pagan black metal & Depressive black metal subgenres? Different enough to warrant their own subgenres?

I'm with you on this one Daniel. The biggest, though not only, differences are thematic. Sure, DSBM usually has a desperate quality to it, but as Daniel asks, is it enough to really necessitate a separate sub-genre? As an extension, does MA really need any sub-genre that is just thematically diverse rather than musically? If so then why not go all-in and include cosmic (or space) black metal and satanic black metal?

Despite having forwarded a case for a couple of sub-genres, I would like to play devil's advocate. As we try to force art in general and music specifically into smaller and smaller boxes, do we run the risk of losing sight of what makes it so great to begin with? As the number of micro-genres increases people seem to get more and more fraught about which exact tiny box a specific release should be assigned to. Witness the petty and essentially meaningless sniping in the comment boxes on RYM's genre voting pages for proof. Genre voting seems not to allow fans to just be fans, they must also be analytical machines who can't be allowed to just enjoy an album, but have to have a sweeping and thorough knowledge of all genres thus allowing them to measure any specific release against rigidly defined parameters in order to come to an informed decision about which pigeonhole to place it in. Failure to do so correctly may then result in derision and insult.

I must admit that I like the fact that Metal Academy isn't too specific in it's genre selection. Do we really need to break a main genre like Doom, Death or Black metal into anything more than a handful of easily differentiated sub-genres? Surely any more specific genre indicators are better as part of a review.

Just thought that I'd posit a differing viewpoint and see what others think.

I don't know enough about dissonant death metal to comment, but how about dissonant black metal as is very big within the Icelandic black metal community?

Psychedelic Doom and Stoner Metal are two very different things Andi. Psych-doom incorporates elements of psychedelic rock and Heavy Psych into a doom metal sound using elements such as Hammond keyboards, flute etc. (early Blood Ceremony). Stoner Metal is based in stoner rock, but with a heavier "metal" edge, whilst maintaining the stoner rock "groove" (Ogre, Cathedral). Stoner doom takes the stoner ethos and combines it with heavy doom sounds to present an even heavier, oppressive, "stoned" atmosphere (Sleep, Electric Wizard).

I too, vote "classic". Classic is one of those words in the English language that has more than one meaning and doesn't exclusively indicate time at all - a bottle of classic coke isn't 100 years old is it - it means it's formulated to a classic recipe and I would say the same is true of a metal release that follows the same formula as the genre's "classic" releases.

I've never been too comfortable with the NWOBHM tag either - it was a scene and isn't a genre, it's like having a "Bay area thrash" genre. In fact, a number of bands from the NWOBHM would struggle to make a case for being metal bands at all, eg Demon. Agree on atmo-sludge too.

A genre I tried to get approved on RYM (unsuccessfully) was Blackened Doom and I would like to suggest it again here. What about the metal genres that incorporate psychedelic elements, such as psych-doom and psychedelic black metal (eg Oranssi Pazuzu)?

I must confess I really like the sound of Classic as a genre term for releases that are pure embodiments of a genre's prime characteristics, it has a certain gravitas to it. Classic Black Metal is a great term that should already be a thing. Maybe this will be the birth of a number of widely accepted new genres of metal! 

On the point of Classic Doom, I have never been a fan of the Traditional Doom Metal tag and tend to ignore it on RYM,  preferring to vote such releases as just plain Doom Metal. So, Ben, do you propose to have both Traditional Doom as a sub-genre and Classic Doom or just one of those because, to my mind, Trad Doom releases would all come under the Classic Doom umbrella.

While I'm on the subject of doom metal sub-genres, would you consider Epic Doom Metal as valid? This isn't recognised by RYM, but I believe there are enough adherents and it is distinguishable sufficiently from other doom metal sub-genres to justify inclusion on MA.

To be honest, it doesn't matter to me one bit whether Into the Pandemonium is adjudged avant-garde metal or not, that's usually a genre (in all art) that I give a wide berth to as I typically find it to be pretentious and, in the case of music (to me anyway) often unlistenable which Into the Pandemonium definitely isn't. I maintain the point (and I'm not implying that you're guilty of this, Daniel) that people will continue to redefine the parameters of what constitutes a given genre, or even historical context of music from a point looking backwards. As a keen history buff anyway, I believe it's important to maintain a factual and consistent narrative to allow understanding of how the present was shaped.

Maybe this wasn't the best place to instigate this discussion and I certainly respect Daniel's view on this point, ItP certainly was a huge influence on the development of gothic metal (although I try not to hold that against it too much!) and it's experimental aspects don't hold up to modern standards, but I still maintain it was an important release at the time as a well-respected band attempted to expand what metal was capable of. I am unfamiliar with the Warning album you cite, Daniel, but I think you would agree, so we're most metal fans at the time, unlike Celtic Frost who were becoming a leading name in metal mid-80s and deserve their reputation as game-changers, which they themselves then went on to attempt to destroy, but that's a conversation for another day.

If the purpose of genre tagging is purely to point someone in the direction of music they might enjoy, then sure, I agree that the genre must be assessed from a modern perspective. All I wish to express, rightly or wrongly, is that I feel there has been a lot of re-evaluating of music that doesn't account for historical context. This isn't a phenomenon confined to metal, there are plenty of people who don't believe Bob Dylan, The Beatles or the Sex Pistols are much to write home about and that's fair enough, but I don't think their importance should be undermined because younger fans can't view them in context.

For the record, I agree with both Tymell and Daniel regarding the bands and albums they mention. Venom were speed metal and MF were heavy metal, but what about Hellhammer and Sodom's very early output? Similarly Reign in Blood and Pleasure to Kill aren't death metal, but what about Seven Churches? If this re-evaluation continues will we reach a time when even Bathory and Morbid Angel are no longer considered extreme metal, because they simply don't conform to redefined parameters?

I only raise the matter to trigger a debate, after all, the forums are a platform for honest, heartfelt discussion and it is something I feel passionately about and I am genuinely interested in what other metalheads think.

I think this poses an interesting question that has bothered me for quite a while as the history of music is revised from a modern viewpoint. Do we judge a release purely on how we feel it sounds today with benefit of hindsight or should it be considered in it's correct historical context?

This was an incredibly experimental release for metal at the time. No one sounded like this and it was certainly considered avant-garde back then. So, my question is, does that historical context now count for nothing as releases are to be judged solely from a modern perspective, compared against others which may well never even exist without the ground-breaking work of the former? 

I've also noticed in my rating patterns that I'm significantly harsher in my cover ratings. I guess because I seek out albums I think I'll enjoy, so those ratings lean towards the positive, whereas covers I just take as I find them.

Likewise. I've also noticed that a lot of bands I really respect have got fucking awful covers - Apostle of Solitude I'm looking at you (amongst others)!

Number of times already that I have mistakenly rated a release I have never heard whilst trying to rate just the artwork? 8.

Number of times already that I have mistakenly rated a release I have never heard whilst trying to rate just the artwork? 11 **Damn this is tricky**

Ben, could you also update Mesarthim's releases to include his recent The Degenerate Era album and Ninth Planet EP.

Well Ben, first off I'm always up for more shit to rate!

Secondly, I am a massive cover art nerd, as I believe you are too (I seem to remember we discussed it on RYM a while back). I love the idea of a chart purely based on the artwork - should present some interesting results. 

I have already started cover rating but I've encountered a bit of a dilemma. I began intending to rate covers purely on aesthetic appeal (to me). Now I'm not sure if that's what you intended when you introduced the feature. For example, do you think a cover should be rated highly if it is particularly appropriate to the atmosphere or aesthetic of the music, despite not being a great piece of "art"? I'm thinking here of genres like black metal with some very simple b&w covers that aren't necessarily great artistically, but really convey the music's ethos well (early Darkthrone albums for example) and the more shocking death metal related covers that I don't appreciate at all artistically but, again, very successfully convey the music's brutality. By extension is it valid to rate the cover of an album you have never listened to?

I guess ultimately it comes down to whether you consider an album's cover a piece of art, or a piece of packaging. Speaking for myseIf, I don't know much about art (or music), but I do know what I like - and what I don't!

Anyway must go, I got me some covers to rate...

Hi Ben, please add Greek blackened thrashers Ravencult (North / Pit)

Daniel, have you heard this from Greek blackened thrashers, Ravencult?

Hi Ben, could you update the releases for Déhà to include his 2020 albums A fleur de peau - II - Burdening Everyone and A fleur de peau - III - A Fire That Does Not Burn (the latter HAS been released, despite RYM giving August 28th as the release date (I have my copy) - see Bandcamp link below.

Bandcamp for A Fleur de Peau - III - A Fire that does not burn

2020 has been a pretty good year for stoner metal releases, despite everything.

My top 10 stoner metal albums so far this year:

#1 Rosy Finch - Scarlet

#2 Blacklab - Abyss

#3 Dopelord - Sign of the Devil

#4 Planet of the Dead - Fear of a Dead Planet

#5 Psyclops - Amalgam

#6 Elephant Tree - Habits

#7 Acid Mammoth - Under Acid Hoof

#8 Kurse - Prophecies, Episode I : The Awakening EP

#9 Forming the Void - Reverie

#10 Tortuga - Deities

Completely agree. This makes accessing the featured releases way simpler.

Just one question. Will this only list the current month's featured releases? Will we no longer be able to see what were featured releases in previous months?

I've previously submitted a review for Sunbather, so I'll summarise. Blackgaze is quite a divisive sub-genre of black metal, owing more to post-metal than black metal in a lot of cases. For me I find it is one of the metal genres that gives me the widest possible reactions, from wholly positive to inutterably negative. It is a sub-genre that, it seems to me, has very little margin for error. Like a high-wire walker, if the band get it wrong, then they crash and burn horribly. Fortunately Sunbather is one of the better Blackgaze albums, but with it's pink cover and positive vibe, it's never going to find favour with the legions of the trve. Me, I like it and it's great for when I want something a little more mellow, but with a bit of a black metal edge. Like just now, actually. In fact it's a perfect black metal Friday feeling of an album!

The main problem I can see with this feature Ben, is when you see an album is, say fifteen years old and you immediately go "Shit man, I can't believe that's fifteen years old, it only seems like yesterday!" A feature that forces us all to face our own mortality. What have you done?!

Thanks Ben, now we can get rid of all those lonely-looking zero-rated releases!

Those are great points you make Daniel. As an older metalhead I now have less demands on my finances and time, but I completely understand where you're coming from and have certainly been there myself as I've referenced previously.

Another problem I do find myself mulling over from time to time with collecting is from the environmental point of view. I justify this to myself by the fact that I aren't much of a consumerist in any other way and surely we're all allowed a little vice, aren't we. I mean, were not all bloody saints are we? I know I'm not!

Don't misunderstand, I still listen to a lot of music in digital format (my wife isn't much of a black metal fan!) a lot of it on tablet and earphones whilst out with my dog or in the car to and from work. But I do really enjoy those times when I have a bit of time to myself and can settle down with a cup of coffee and a Darkthrone LP and really soak that shit up. Helps me deal with all the other crap that goes on in life.

Great point about Bandcamp Fridays where 100% of the proceeds go to the bands, Xephyr. Now that most bands are unable to play live gigs it's more important than ever that fans support them by actually buying their music. Many times buying from Bandcamp I have had a short note or even on odd occasions a full letter from the band expressing their appreciation - it really means a lot to these guys. Very often they send extra stuff, too - stickers, badges, posters, even promo CDs they have lying around.

Also, the art is absolutely one of the main pulls of vinyl over CD and their are some gorgeous packages available nowadays. Last year's Esoteric album, A Pyrrhic Existence, for example, was a triple gatefold that no CD booklet could ever do justice to.

While I understand why most folks no longer feel the need to actually own music anymore due to technology advances, I guess it depends where you're coming from. Getting in to metal and heavy rock back in the day meant just one thing - physical product and for me that physical contact with my music is something I've never been able to shake. I did sell a massive proportion of my collection of vinyl back in the late 90s when vinyl seemed dead and money was tight and I've regretted it ever since. I got rid of loads of 80s thrash and 70s hard rock LPs that would cost a bomb to replace now. Currently my collection is close to 1000 CDs, 400 LPs and a couple of hundred cassettes (mainly 70s and 80s bootlegs bought from record fairs years ago). Luckily I have a spare room I can store them all in and I justify the cost from having given up smoking -  something I finally managed nearly ten years ago! I usually buy from Bandcamp whenever I can or direct from the labels so that the bands get more of the cash, but if it's an out of print rarity I will sometimes use Discogs and buy second hand. Unfortunately high street stores usually just stock the usual Kerrang! darlings if they stock metal at all so I have pretty much given up on them. It's just a pity postal charges are so high. Sometimes postage costs as much as the album itself and importing to the UK from the US in particular is ridiculously expensive, especially now the pound has taken a nosedive. Anyway must go - got to reorder my collection again!!

Come on, surely this album is actually encoded into the DNA of all self-respecting metalheads. It should be required teaching on any school curriculum. Personally it's the album that began my love affair with metal. I'd been listening to more mainstream rock in the early half of the seventies, The Who, Queen and Alice Cooper being particular favourites, but when I heard Paranoid around '76 something clicked in my brain and I knew I was home! In fact my obsessive need to check out new music, I am convinced, is down to my need to reproduce that very first hit as War Pigs boomed out of those shabby old speakers and I felt a rush unlike anything I'd ever experienced before. This album was the introduction to a lifelong obsession and I will be eternally grateful that it exists.

Hi Ben, sorry but could you please add Battle Dagorath (US) also.

I've just realised I've not posted a list on this topic yet, so here goes:

#25. Melechesh - The Epigenesis

#24. Monolord - Vænir

#23. Triptykon - Melana Chasmata

#22. Černá - Restoring Life

#21. Enslaved - RIITIIR 

#20. The Ruins of Beverast - Exuvia

#19. Bell Witch - Mirror Reaper

#18. Psicosfera - Beta

#17. Tchornobog - Tchornobog

#16. Esoteric - A Pyrrhic Existence

#15. Pallbearer - Sorrow and Extinction

#14. Blood Ceremony - The Eldritch Dark

#13. Kauan - Sorni Nai

#12. Saor - Aura

#11. Windhand - Soma

#10. Yith - Immemorial

#9. Inter Arma - Sulphur English

#8. Grand Magus - Hammer of the North

#7. Winterfylleth - The Mercian Sphere

#6. Venenum - Trance of Death

#5. SubRosa - More Constant Than the Gods

#4. Monolithe - Monolithe III

#3. Panopticon - Kentucky

#2. Hell - Hell III

#1. Oranssi Pazuzu - Värähtelijä

Boy, that was tough - there's so many more I wanted to include.

Looks like none of mine match the original list. Guess I'm just not hip enough!

What most non-metalheads fail to realise is that true metalheads couldn't give a rat's ass what they think!

Ben, please add Witchskull's new album A Driftwood Cross.

Could you add German atmospheric sludge band Moribund Mantras please Ben.

Hi Ben, could you add Belarusian black metal band Raven Throne (not to be confused with Austrian folk metallers Raventhrone).

Chimp Spanner must be the latest band whose name came via the "Acme Random Band Name Generator" software!

Ben, could you please add Polish thrashers Gallower.

Necrodeath - "Into The Macabre" (1987)

Sonny, this has got your name all over it.

How have I never heard of this band - a debut as awesome as this and a total of thirteen albums released and I've never heard a note of them before!?

They may be Italians (hardly a hotbed for thrash, Italy is it) but this absolutely kicks the shit out of a ton of better-regarded outfits. Even for 1987 this is a stand-out album, the aggression of death metal in the vein of Possessed makes their thrashing sound super-evil. I'll have to check out the rest of their releases, but they'll need to be good to not disappoint after this.

Keep them recs coming Daniel, there's been some real killers recently for which you have my undying thanks!!

Ben, please add Havukruunu's latest album Uinuos syömein sota.

I'll give it a spin...

Could you add Italian black metallers Fides Inversa please, Ben.

Hi Ben, please add Eremit's new EP, Desert of Ghouls.

Jettegryta, the second preview track from Enslaved's new album Utgard, due out October 2nd. Better than the first preview, Homebound, as it exhibits more of Enslaved's black metal roots woven into it's progressive metal.

Exumer - "Rising From The Sea" (1987)

Am I the only one who finds German thrashers Exumer's least celebrated sophomore effort to be better than their highly regarded debut "Possessed By Fire" from the previous year? From my brief googling it would seem to be that way. Everyone seems to say that it was a bit of a misfire with flat riffs & very little energy but I can't for the life of me see where that opinion's coming from. Sure it's not as raw, is slightly more accomplished musically & is a complete & utter rip-off of "Hell Awaits" & "Reign In Blood" era Slayer but metal doesn't get any better than classic Slayer & the band do a pretty good job at interpreting it so who fucking cares. The new vocalist is pretty bad ass too & he contributes a more than decent Tom Araya impression. Despite a stupid two minute S.O.D. style comedy number I find this to be a massively underrated record.

4/5

I've just reviewed Exumer's second (better) album and I completely agree Daniel. Sure the first is good, but this is the best Slayer-influenced album I've heard outside of the masters themselves. Some people just get too caught-up in over-thinking metal - sometimes you just gotta let go! We're not talking Mozart here for fucks sake!

Holy Moses - "Finished With The Dogs" (1987)

Rip-snorting Teutonic thrash with amazing riffs & aggressive female vocals. It's tight & focused as hell & I love it. In fact, it's a world away from Holy Moses' lackluster speed metal debut "Queen Of Siam". This is pure thrash metal from start to finish.

4/5

Just checked this out. What an amazing leap in quality from the original. Thanks for highlighting this Daniel.

Blue Oyster Cult - Tyranny And Mutation (1973)

Hard rock is the flavour of the day for Sunday, as the sun is out for the first time in about a week.  The sophomore from Blue Oyster Cult is a bright sounding record that is still full of their trademark shadowy allure.

Great album, especially side one.

Tracks like Hot Rails to Hell and 7 Screaming Dizbusters whilst not being metal as such, enormously influenced metal, especially thematically.

Ben, I think you may well enjoy the latest Convocation album.

Epic death doom with a little extra!

Full album at Bandcamp

Hi Ben, could you add Iceland's Äkth Gánahëth please.

Hi Ben, please add Croatian doomsters Old Night.

One small issue I have with the clan challenges is that due to the nature of the charts on MA, the albums in the challenges have a disproportionate advantage in the charts as more members are encouraged to review them.

I actually think it's the other way around. The less ratings a release has the more likely that it hasn't been shit-canned by someone & that's why we see some strange inclusions at the top of the charts that only have the bare minimum quantity of ratings to qualify yet all have come from obsessive fans that rate it extremely highly. This will disappear over time as we up the minimum rating requirements for the charts.

I thought we were all "obsessive fans" here, that's one of the main attractions of the Academy for me. I for one hope MA's charts don't merely reflect the charts of RYM and the likes where only the most well-known and obvious albums rule the roost. With a minimum rating threshold which is currently one sixth of the most-rated album's number of ratings (Ride the Lightning's 30) as long as no one is cheating (as was exposed recently) then surely any album on the chart deserves it's place.